Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Every sperm is a baby

By Capt. Fogg

It will always be impossible to convince all religious people that religion isn't the mother of religious fanaticism and of the self-righteousness that makes fanaticism so dangerous. In fact they may be right in that such ego disorders seem to be a general human failing, albeit one that so often finds a home in Churches, Mosques and Synagogues -- but that doesn't soften the fear that from the frustration believers in old religions feel about the implacable advance of what I like to call enlightenment, a movement will arise like movements in the past to overthrow an age of reason and science and relative freedom.

"any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman’s vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child.”

There seems to be nothing in that statement that might hint it did not originate in the 5th century before the Christian era and nothing to suggest that it wasn't a measure introduced by a Republican, but alas, neither is true. Oklahoma State Senator Constance Johnson is a Democrat and she has introduced an amendment to pending Senate Bill 1433, a typical "life begins at conception" bill, that says that the resulting fetus
“at every stage of development (has) all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state.”

Ms. Johnson wants to extend that right to a sperm cell, although apparently she thinks egg cells are exempt -- since otherwise not getting pregnant might also be as murderous as masturbation. Still, the "every sperm is a baby" bill doesn't have a chance, but apparently Rick Santorum does and probably for few other reasons than his own ridiculous positions on interfering with private lives in the name of small government and Big Religion. Santorum has attracted a plurality of Republican loonies in Missouri, Colorado and Minnesota.

It's hard to think that Rick has a real shot at the presidency, but you know, I've been looking at Costa Rica lately.

I'm generally very intolerant of the "both sides are equally bad" arguments that depend on fraudulent accounting and false equivalence to forgive the side with the preponderance of guilt, but Geez - what does it say about Oklahoma Democrats that she is allowed to speak for them?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share


Blogger Libby Spencer said...

Good Lord. I hate it when Democrats embrace the crazy. But it is Oklahoma. Think they might all be kind of nutty there.

11:07:00 AM  
Blogger Marcellina said...

at every stage of development (has) all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state.

Wow. What would this mean for pregnant undocumented immigrants? I would be curious to know if anyone supports both this and measures to undo automatic citizenship at birth.

12:15:00 PM  
Blogger Richard Stanford said...

Er, it says that you completely missed the point that she was trying to make by extending the concept slightly to a ridiculous end-state in an unpassable, unenforcable, unconstitutional bill? Swoosh...

12:35:00 PM  
Blogger Capt. Fogg said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

5:19:00 PM  
Blogger Capt. Fogg said...

At the time I wrote this, there was nothing to indicate she wasn't serious and as my DSL line has been down until now, I was voiceless.

5:45:00 PM  
Blogger Libby Spencer said...

Hey I believed it too Fogg. That's how insane our political system is right now. Nothing seems too far fetched to be true. Relieved to know it was a joke to make a point though.

10:25:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home