What, me worry?
by Capt. Fogg
Bush's speech before the UN today was all about human rights violations in Iran and Burma and Syria and Belarus, but unless my hearing is going, I didn't hear any concern for the crackdown on the opposition to Pervez Musharraf in recent days. Perhaps that was not a proper venue, but the concern remains over incidents like that in Islamabad yesterday where police broke up a protest outside the Supreme Court which is hearing a case challenging the constitutional validity of General Musharraf's dual role as president and chief Army officer. Leaders of two political parties have been jailed and are being held incommunicado.
It's disturbing enough that Condoleezza Rice expressed concern over the arrests in this nuclear armed country that contains both moderate and extreme elements including Taliban and perhaps Osama bin Laden. So unsettling indeed that our embassy has issued a statement calling the arrests "extremely disturbing and confusing for the friends of Pakistan," and calling on the government to free the detainees. Our moral superiority in such matters, of course is severely wounded by our denial of habeas corpus to perceived enemies at the whim of our own government and suspicion of election tampering in the last two presidential contests.
Accusations, explanations and justifications are flying around from various factions too numerous for me to comprehend and the concerns of the US have been rebuffed by Pakistan's Foreign Ministry:
Dictator and treader upon human rights that Musharraf may be, and possibly worthy as some of his opposition may also be, there are worse who would like to depose him and al Qaeda in Pakistan is a far less dubious reality than al Qaeda in Iraq. Will his attempt to stifle opposition play into the hands of the worst of that opposition? Pakistan's Daily Times worries about it and who's to blame the rest of us that understand even less of this complex and fragile situation from worrying? The only thing that will help me sleep tonight is knowing that George Bush and his administration are on duty.
Cross posted at Human Voices
Bush's speech before the UN today was all about human rights violations in Iran and Burma and Syria and Belarus, but unless my hearing is going, I didn't hear any concern for the crackdown on the opposition to Pervez Musharraf in recent days. Perhaps that was not a proper venue, but the concern remains over incidents like that in Islamabad yesterday where police broke up a protest outside the Supreme Court which is hearing a case challenging the constitutional validity of General Musharraf's dual role as president and chief Army officer. Leaders of two political parties have been jailed and are being held incommunicado.
It's disturbing enough that Condoleezza Rice expressed concern over the arrests in this nuclear armed country that contains both moderate and extreme elements including Taliban and perhaps Osama bin Laden. So unsettling indeed that our embassy has issued a statement calling the arrests "extremely disturbing and confusing for the friends of Pakistan," and calling on the government to free the detainees. Our moral superiority in such matters, of course is severely wounded by our denial of habeas corpus to perceived enemies at the whim of our own government and suspicion of election tampering in the last two presidential contests.
Accusations, explanations and justifications are flying around from various factions too numerous for me to comprehend and the concerns of the US have been rebuffed by Pakistan's Foreign Ministry:
"If the U.S. Embassy is confused, it would be well advised not to make such statements,"said spokeswoman Tasneem Aslam. That doesn't do much to make me feel better and I'm sure it makes Dr. Rice feel as ineffectual as she is.
Dictator and treader upon human rights that Musharraf may be, and possibly worthy as some of his opposition may also be, there are worse who would like to depose him and al Qaeda in Pakistan is a far less dubious reality than al Qaeda in Iraq. Will his attempt to stifle opposition play into the hands of the worst of that opposition? Pakistan's Daily Times worries about it and who's to blame the rest of us that understand even less of this complex and fragile situation from worrying? The only thing that will help me sleep tonight is knowing that George Bush and his administration are on duty.
Cross posted at Human Voices
Labels: Pakistan
posted by Libby Spencer at 4:36 PM
5 Comments:
which is it that you are concerned about in this post? you have me a bit confused.
1. the fact that Bush did not include it in his speech?
2, the fact that the protestors were arrested?
3, the fact they are being held incommunicado
4. Condi's expressed concern and our so-called moral superiority?
Is there anyone who isn't confused? I am indeed concerned when any election process includes locking up the opposition on dubious charges and I'm concerned about fundamentalist groups using it to create turmoil to further their ambitions.
Evidence that this is not going to be an orderly transfer of power or a transfer that is trending toward an open secular democracy is what concerns me.
huh? now you really have me confused. which transfer of power are you talking about now? which ccccountry are you referring to when you spoke of this concern?
I'm concerned that there not be chaos in Pakistan that could be used to the advantage of Extremists. How much more clear can I be?
Of course I'm also concerned about the continuation of our own process.
ok, I just did not want to comment based on any assumptions I may have come to, that is all. thank you for clarification. from my first questions many different concerns could be assumed.
in accordance to your explanation i can only say "chaos" is a very good probability there as well as in other countries also in that area of the world. and i say this regardless of outcome in Iraq or Afghanistan in my opinion.
Our government has stirred up a hornet's nest there now.
if the outcome comes about as our government hopes i see the people themselves arising against their governments if they do not get the changes they want peacefully.
if the outcome comes about against our government's goal i see the new government or governments creating chaos there and in the area.
Post a Comment
<< Home