No visa for Lancet study researcher
By Libby
It's difficult to read this as anything other than suppression of relevant research.
Interestingly, Dr. Lafta wasn't scheduled to speak on civilian deaths but rather was to present his findings on cancer rates, particularly among children in southern Iraq. I suppose our governments would rather that subject not be publicly broached either. It just might get the people all worked up about DU weaponry again. I suspect there is a connection between the two that could be made.
[cross-posted to The Reaction]
It's difficult to read this as anything other than suppression of relevant research.
Riyadh Lafta and his colleagues have been trying for months to get a U.S. travel visa so the doctor could speak at a medical conference at the University of Washington today.Despite the State Department's protestations, it's painfully clear the co-author of the controversial Lancet study on civilian deaths in Iraq is deliberately being prevented from sharing his work with his US peers and it's no surprise that the UK would aid and abet this campaign. Both governments have a vested interest in protecting their shady statistics from challenge.
The State Department has cited miscommunication as the reason for the visa holdup.
As an alternative, Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, B.C., invited Lafta to deliver his lecture today, which was to have been broadcast by video to the UW. But this week, the British government denied him a four-hour transit visa for a stopover between the Middle East and Canada.
Interestingly, Dr. Lafta wasn't scheduled to speak on civilian deaths but rather was to present his findings on cancer rates, particularly among children in southern Iraq. I suppose our governments would rather that subject not be publicly broached either. It just might get the people all worked up about DU weaponry again. I suspect there is a connection between the two that could be made.
[cross-posted to The Reaction]
posted by Libby Spencer at 6:02 PM
4 Comments:
I would suggest that the fallout (no pun intended) from the DU weapons is of more concern for the U.S. and the U.K. than the civilian who were killed directly.
Nice post.
Thanks. I think you're right. Nobody wants to talk about that dirty little secret of the wars.
A lot of veterans have been fighting to get DU subject on the table, with, from what I've gathered so far, little effect. Really too bad. But, with draft in place any time now, things will change. First for the worst, of course, but eventually people will be smoking pot on White house lawn again...
Romunov - I like the vision of pot smoking on the White House lawn. That would surely be a sign of peace.
Post a Comment
<< Home