Can't see the smoke for the fire?
Steven Couch at BlueStateRed posts on AfterDowningStreet.org. Steven and I have debated this issue privately for some time now and he's always said that he'll believe Bush deliberately lied when he sees evidence proving it. He's still not convinced.
With due respect and affection for my collegeaue and friend, if nothing short of a signed confession by our Misleader-In-Chief will constitute a "smoking gun," then I'm afraid he's doomed to get caught in the cross-fire of Bushian deceit.
With due respect and affection for my collegeaue and friend, if nothing short of a signed confession by our Misleader-In-Chief will constitute a "smoking gun," then I'm afraid he's doomed to get caught in the cross-fire of Bushian deceit.
posted by Libby Spencer at 10:47 AM
1 Comments:
What about circumstantial evidence? Men have been tried in court by aggressive prosecutors with less evidence against them.
Post a Comment
<< Home