By Capt. Fogg
Reckless
and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and
sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their
mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not
bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their
utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call
upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages
which they think support their position, although they understand
neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion.
--Saint Augustine: De Genesi ad litteram libri duodecim --
______________________
Well
you knew it was going to happen. When it comes to a vessel big enough
to contain the egos of the illiterate Biblical literalists, the world is
not enough and if anything can expand, can inflate faster than the
early universe, it's those very egos who insist we consider their
idiotic, superstitious, fatuous and fact-free delusions to be reasonable
alternatives to demonstrated and proven physical law.
Too
bad that moronic mob of pretenders to received authority know as little
about Christianity and its foundations as they know about nature as
revealed in science and mathematics. Anything once rational and
functional in early Christianity seems to have shed those attributes as
vestigial organs, like the hip bones in a whale as an example of just
how evolution works in all things.
There is nothing about the origin of species in the Fox TV series
Cosmos
that is without massive evidential support or that hasn't been
thoroughly and repeatedly demonstrated in the fossil record and in the
laboratory. The truth is that DNA based life forms not only can and do
but
must evolve over long periods of time into quite different
life forms because of the mechanisms involved. To argue otherwise is
either dishonest or stupid or pathological. Face it, only if one is
staggeringly uninformed about basic physics and chemistry, geology and
paleontology
or mentally impaired and basically dishonest, is
there any need to treat the fundamentals of science and mathematics as
"opinions" that can honestly and reasonably be held by honest and
reasonable people.
Few people would take the argument
that because one can't come up with a final figure for Pi all numbers
are so equally probable that I can't be mocked for saying it's 4 or
worse. Would anyone honestly assert that I must be allowed in every
classroom to insist that it's 4 because there's an old paleolithic
legend I choose to delude myself with? But it seems that there are more
than a few who will, for many sinister and stupid reasons, tell you
that facts are irrelevant and demand the right to interrupt your
evening's entertainment and your offspring's education to demand respect
for stupidity.
Danny Falkner, of
Answers In Genesis showed up on the "Christ Centered"
Janet Mefford Show
yesterday to accuse the Fox television series and its
host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, of "marginalizing" those marginally rational
and totally dishonest delusionals with "dissenting" views
on accepted scientific truths,
reports Right Wing Watch.
They say it's only fair to be allowed to refute the irrefutable -- and
because they "believe" and belief is all they need to shut you up.
“Boy, but when you have so many scientists who simply do not accept
Darwinian evolution, it seems to me that that might be something to
throw in there, you know, the old, ‘some scientists say this, others
disagree and think this,’ but that’s not even allowed,”
Said
Mefford, and presumably there were nodding heads all over the halls of
idiocy and cesspits of mendacity. It's frightening to think someone
can think of getting away with asserting that we have "so many
scientists" and can't see the inherent contradiction. (If you prefer
unsupportable tradition over science, you're not a scientist)
So
perhaps we have so many football fans who think the Seahawks lost the
Superbowl, that the Sun orbits the flat Earth and Methusala lived 900
years. I have the right to interrupt anyone to assert this and for
free. May I demand the right to show up in any church on any Sunday to
insist that there is no Yahweh, no El or Elohim, no trinity, no creation
and never could have been? That Jesus was nothing but another of many,
failed anti-Roman zealots, that there is no heaven, no hell, no sin, no
forgiveness, no resurrection -- no spirits, demons, angels and no
souls? Do I have the right to set up an altar to Zog in every Church,
synagogue, Temple, Mosque and public school?
And why the hell not?
Because
it's not about fairness. It's not about honesty, it's certainly not
about freedom of speech or of belief . As Salmon Rushdie said of
Fundamentalism: it's about power. It's about bringing untold trouble and sorrow, it's the idiot's crusade.
Labels: religious right, science